> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.getvirtualbrain.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Data Room Gap Analysis

> Scan an entire data room against your information request list and surface coverage, gaps, and missing documentation in one run

**Goal:** map what a data room actually contains against your information request list, and get a prioritized view of every gap, without reviewing hundreds of documents by hand.

<Frame>
  <iframe style={{ width: '100%', aspectRatio: '16/9' }} src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/evM7pLncDaE" title="Data Room Gap Analysis: workflow walkthrough" frameBorder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowFullScreen />
</Frame>

## Setup

Two inputs, both loaded into a [Brain](/features/brains/creating-brains) before you run the App:

* **The data room**: the document set you need to assess. In the walkthrough, it's a target's publicly available investor relations data room.
* **Your information request list**: the questions or research areas you want covered. The demo uses a 23-question information request list, but any checklist or questionnaire works.

<Tip>
  Keep the Brain scoped to this one data room. Mixing in documents from other engagements dilutes the coverage assessment; the App should only see what the counterparty actually provided.
</Tip>

## How it works

<Steps>
  <Step title="Upload the data room">
    Add the full document set to a Brain. The App handles the volume. This is the labor-intensive review it automates.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Upload your information request list">
    Add the questionnaire or research-area list you want the data room measured against.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Run the App and review the gap analysis">
    When the run completes, the results open as a gap analysis dashboard organized in a pyramid structure: overall coverage first, then detail on demand.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## What you get

The output is built to drill from headline to evidence:

* **Overall coverage**: how complete the data room is relative to your full information request.
* **Breakdown by dimension**: coverage for each section of your request list.
* **Question-level detail**. For every question: the nature of the gap, the coverage percentage, and its severity.
* **Best available answer**: for each question, the strongest answer the existing documents support, so you know what you can already work with.
* **Recommended actions**: a table of missing documentation to request, prioritized to improve your completion rate.

The first pass on a data room becomes a defensible artifact. You walk into the next management call with a precise, evidence-backed request list.

## Pro tips

* **Run it on day one.** The earlier you know the gaps, the earlier the counterparty can fill them. Document requests are usually the long pole in a diligence timeline.
* **Check the severity calls yourself.** Every gap finding traces back to the underlying documents. Review the calls on your highest-priority questions before the request list goes to the other side.
* **Re-run after each data room update.** When new documents land, run the App again to track how coverage improves against the same request list.

## Related

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Valuation: Trading Comps" icon="scale-balanced" href="/use-cases/due-diligence-transactions/valuation-comps">
    Once the data room is complete enough, move to valuation
  </Card>

  <Card title="Creating Brains" icon="brain" href="/features/brains/creating-brains">
    Set up a dedicated Brain per deal for clean, scoped analysis
  </Card>

  <Card title="Using App Templates" icon="grid-2" href="/features/apps/using-templates">
    Find, launch, and duplicate templates from the library
  </Card>

  <Card title="Sourced Answers" icon="link" href="/features/chats/sourced-answers">
    How every finding traces back to a source document
  </Card>
</CardGroup>
